Eagle slaughter – update

Charges over illegal use of poisons

The Tubbut farmer and agricultural seed company owner was charged with the illegal use of poisons to kill Wedge-tailed Eagles, in the Bairnsdale Court on 13th November. EEG attended to hear case.

The Age story next day painted a very disturbing picture. The text messages between the farm manager (found guilty in September last year of killing over 400 wedge-tailed eagles and sentenced to 14 days in jail and fined $2500) and the farm owner shows “calculated, unacceptable and disgraceful behaviour”, to quote the magistrate.  

This case was over the illegal mis-use and storage of 1080 and an insecticide, not the killing of eagles – that’s still to come.

The emails and text messages, in which the pair secretly referred to eagles as “foxes”, were revealed at Bairnsdale Magistrates Court on Wednesday as Auer, 57, pleaded guilty to the misuse of agricultural chemicals.

The Bairnsdale Court

The comment from the magistrate was that he was “fortunate that there is no provision in the legislation for a term of imprisonment”, which let him know he was getting off lightly.

“On October 5, 2016, Auer messaged Silvester asking: “Seen any eagles?”
“6 more = 24 in 2 days,” Silvester replied.
“Gee that’s amazing, they just keep coming? I just wouldn’t have dreamed of those numbers. Bloody well done,” Auer replied a few days later.
In late October of 2016, Auer messaged Silvester saying he had picked up a “different chem to try”, later adding he had “looked up that poison and it is deadly to birds apparently so should work”.
At some stage, Auer told Silvester to refer to eagles within email communication as “foxes”, court documents show.
In January 2017, Silvester wrote to Auer: “3 more foxs [sic] = 52, crazy”.

The Magistrate was Simon Garnett. He seemed very progressive and fair and we were impressed by his concern over the impacts of such killings on indigenous culture.  

The charge sheet is attached below. John Auer refused to be interviewed it says, but pleaded guilty.

Auer was up on 10 charges; four were struck out and the rest were bundled into two.

There are still two outstanding charges to be heard under the Wildlife Act. They are Sections 43.1 and 54.1.

43 Hunting, taking or destroying protected wildlife

(1) A person must not hunt, take or destroy other protected wildlife.

Penalty: 50 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment or both the fine and imprisonment and an additional penalty of 5 penalty units for every head of wildlife in respect of which an offence has been committed.

54 Killing wildlife by poison

(1) Any person who kills, destroys, takes or injures wildlife by any bait impregnated with poison or any substance, whether liquid, solid, or gaseous, which is prescribed to be a poison for the purposes of this section or lays any such poison or substance with intent to kill, destroy, take, or injure wildlife shall be guilty of an offence against this Act.

Penalty: 100 penalty units or 6 months imprisonment or both the fine and imprisonment

His defense lawyer painted him as an upstanding community-minded citizen, successful business man, loving father and husband, cares for his sheep (grew cabbages and kale for his lambs and needed the insecticide to kill the grubs that ate the cabbages), owns a global agricultural seed business, travels overseas and interstate, employs many people and so on. We weren’t sure if these details were to attempt to lessen the seriousness of his actions.  

The prosecution, Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions (DJPR) mentioned the impact such killing has had on local indigenous people too. The magistrate asked for those statements. They were also read out and were quite powerful.

On charges 1 and 3, Magistrate Garnett gave a 12 month good behaviour bond PLUS a $25,000 fine to go to the court which will then distribute to appropriate wildlife groups through Gippsland, plus costs of $3870.

On charges 5,6,7,9, John Auer was ordered to complete 100 hours community work.

There is also a conviction recorded.

None of this will look good for someone running a global agricultural business to have been charged with illegal use of restricted chemicals and very poor handling of poisons.  

This PDF file is the charge sheet which was read out in court.

2 Replies to “Eagle slaughter – update”

  1. What grossly inadequate ahem penalties for such simply atrocious and premeditated crimes against the Environment and our majestic Wedgies.
    I’m totally disgusted by this so called result.
    Sure hope that there’s an appeal.
    Guessing it’s all about connections, connections…

    Reply

    1. Linda, this case was only to deal with John Auer’s (pron hour’s) mis-use of ag chemicals under the Ag Act. The case against killing protected birds under the Wildlife Act is still to be heard we hope.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *