Science and Reports

As well as all the moral and economic arguments against destroying nature and forests, there are also endless research reports and scientific findings that show our governments are deliberately denying empirical evidence. To deny sound, peer reviewed science is as absurd as declaring the world is flat. Environmental arguments are not merely emotional bleatings as industry likes to portray. The reports cited here are merely the tip of the iceberg currently being ignored for political expedience.

91 scientists send letter to EPA on biomass carbon

Friday, June 20, 2014

Originally published at: 

On 19th June 2014 a group of 91 scientists sent a letter from 91 scientists in the US to their Environmental Protection Authority urging it to heed the input from its own science advisors that there is no scientific justification for accepting the biomass energy industry’s often repeated assertion that just because trees and other biomass regrow, all biomass energy should automatically be considered “carbon neutral”. The latest and best science tells us just the opposite: that not all biomass is made equal. In particular, chipping up and burning whole trees for electricity actually increases carbon emissions for decades compared to fossil fuels like coal.

Researchers show emissions from forests influence very first stage of cloud formation

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Originally published at: 

PITTSBURGH—Clouds play a critical role in Earth's climate. Clouds also are the largest source of uncertainty in present climate models, according to the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Much of the uncertainty surrounding clouds' effect on climate stems from the complexity of cloud formation.

How forests carry out their own fire suppression management

Thursday, April 10, 2014

How did forests ever cope before the era of government planned small scale bushfires? Forests had many brilliant systems in place that digested leaf litter, kept the understory damp and a layer of nutrient rich humus at ground level, all operating with clever symbiotic relationships between plants, animals and fungi.

Below is just a selection of extracts from research which shows how important these ground layer ecosystems are – and how vulnerable they are to planned government burns.

Trees, Trash, and Toxics: How Biomass Energy Has Become the New Coal

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Electricity generation from biomass waste is more polluting and worse for the climate than coal, according to a new study by an environmental advocacy firm.

The report, put together by the Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) and delivered to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), concludes that biomass power plants emit more pollution than omparable coal plants or commercial waste incinerators, according to a news release from the group.

Carbon accumulation in large trees

Thursday, March 27, 2014

This research counters the logging industry argument that a young post-logging regrowth forest (and plantations) accumulate more carbon than a natural mature forest. It highlights the importance of old large trees in the carbon cycle.

Read the research PDF at 2014_March-tree-growth_Nature.pdf


Forests Around Chernobyl Aren’t Decaying Properly

Friday, March 14, 2014

Originally published at: 

And just what is it that the govt burns kill when thousands of ha of forest is torched annually? ‘Ecological burning’ it is NOT!    Jill

It wasn't just people, animals and trees that were affected by radiation exposure at Chernobyl, but also the decomposers: insects, microbes, and fungi